Clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of failed fixation of proximal humeral fracrtures in the elderly patients / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as a revision procedure for the failed fixation of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients.@*METHODS@#A retrospective analysis was performed on 8 patients with failed internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures from May 2014 to March 2020, including 3 males and 5 females, aged from 65 to 75 years old. All 8 patients underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and the mean time between initial fixation and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty ranged from 8 to 16 months. Range of motion(ROM), University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA) shoulder score, visual analogue scale (VAS), self-rating anxiety scale(SAS), and Constant-Murley score of shoulder function were assessed pre-operatively and at the last follow-up. Complications relating to the surgery were recorded.@*RESULTS@#All 8 patients successfully followed up. The mean follow-up after reverse total shoulder arhroplasty ranged from 16 to 28 months. The range of motion (forward flexion, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation) of the affected shoulder was significantly improved after surgery, and the post-operative VAS, SAS and UCLA scores were also significantly improved. For the Constant-Murley score of shoulder joint function, the total scores and the subscores of pain, daily activities, range of motion and strength test at the last follow-up were all significantly improved. Scapular glenoid notch was observed in patient, which was evaluated as grade 1 on imaging. All the other patients did not develop specific or non-specific complications.@*CONCLUSION@#Reverse total shoulder arhroplasty is an appropriate treatment as a revision surgery for failed fixation of proximal humeral fractures. It has shown satisfactory clinical outcomes, accelerating the rehabilitation of shoulder function and improving the quality of life.

Application of drilling columnar autogenous iliac bone graft and clinical analysis of postoperative complications in the donor bone region / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the clinical effect of drilling columnar autogenous iliac bone graft and analyze the effect of bone grafting on postoperative complications in donor site.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From March 2014 to October 2016, 68 patients with autogenous iliac bone graft were retrospectively analyzed, and divided into drilling group and osteotomy group, 34 patients in each group. In drilling group, there were 24 males and 10 females with an average age of (40.06±5.60) years old ranging from 23 to 53 years old;in osteotomy group, there were 26 males and 18 females with an average age of (39.32±6.44) ranging from 22 to 56 years old. The operative time of bone extraction, blood loss in donor area, healing time of donor site and postoperative donor site complications were observed and compared between the two groups. VAS score was used to evaluate the pain of donor site in different periods after operation.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months, with an average of 16.9 months in drilling group and 17.1 months in osteotomy groups. The bone healing structure was displayed in the recipient area in two groups, the effect of autogenous iliac bone grafting was good. There was no significant difference in operative time between two groups (>0.05). There was significant difference between two groups in the amount of donor site bleeding and the time of donor site wound healing(<0.05). Postoperative complications(iliac depression and numbness) were significantly different between two groups (<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS score between two groups at 2 weeks after operation(>0.05). VAS scores of drilling group at 6 months and 1 year after operation were lower than those of osteotomy group (1.85±0.61 vs 2.97±0.67, 0.000; 1.15±0.56 vs 2.41±0.61, 0.000).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>When bone graft is no need to have large pieces of special shape or more cortical bone iliac, it is simple to operate and less complications postoperative by drilling type columnar autogenous iliac bone graft. What's more, it has the obvious advantages of promote healing, improve patient quality of life compared with traditional osteotomy.</p>